Good morning, RVA! Itās 71 °F, and today you should expect heat, humidity, and a chance for rain until this evening. Then, this evening, you should expect a chance for a lot of rain. Things dry and and cool down tomorrow, though.
As of this morning, the Virginia Department of Health reports 449āļø new positive cases of the coronavirus in the Commonwealth and 13āļø new deaths as a result of the virus. VDH reports 24āļø new cases in and around Richmond (Chesterfield: 15, Henrico: -1 (???), and Richmond: 10). Since this pandemic began, 366 people have died in the Richmond region. Whoa, that is a low number of new reported positive cases! Thatās the fewest number of new cases reported in a single day since July 6th. I have no idea if thatās a reporting issue or what, but it does seem like weāre riding a downward trendāat least for this particular metric. Speaking of metrics, the Virginia Department of Health released a new Pandemic Metrics dashboard that may interest some of you. The gist here is that you can look at a single, rolled-up metric for your region, called ātransmission extent,ā and see the status of the coronavirus at that point in time (calculated weekly). A bunch of numbers and trends get wrapped up in to transmission extent, so I think itās probably helpful for decision-makers to use while figuring out what to close down or open up. Itās certainly better than everyone just refreshing the percent positivity chart over and over again. If you really want to nerd out, check out the methodology document for how they put together transmission extent (PDF). The āregion,ā as defined by VDH, though, is super big, so Iām not sure transmission extent will help you decide whether or not you should stockpile toilet paper and barricade your doors. However, there is a CDC School Metrics tab (which lines up with the CDCās recently-released indicators for school decision-making table) that you can filter down by locality. While focused on helping schools decide how to move forward with their reopening plans, this tab is probably more helpful for those of us obsessed with local data. Unfortunately, as of this moment, none of the tabs load for me! Iām sure VDH will get their IT issues sorted later this morning, thoughš¤. Kate Masters at the Virginia Mercury has a screenshot to tide you over until then.
At last nightās City Council meeting, which you can watch here, Council passed a lot of the papers I had my eye onāincluding the resolutions asking the Mayor for more money for both the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (RES. 2020-R053) and public defenders (RES. 2020-R054). These types of resolutions are fine, and clearly lay out Councilās budgetary priorities to the Mayor, but, always remember that resolutions are non-binding. Plus, ultimately, City Council approves the budget! Keep both of these resolutions and their patrons in mind when we get into next yearās budget season. Will these same legislators fight for these priorities with their actual legislative authority? Or will they just ask the Mayor to do the work and move on? I imagine money will be in short supply next year, so are they willing to make cuts and hard decisions to get these priorities funded? Weāll have to wait and see, but, in the mean time, I need to figure out how to keep track of stuff like this (another Trello board??). Also, surprising literally zero people, Council decided to continue the paper rezoning the area around the Science Museum, Allison, and VCU & VUU Pulse stations (ORD. 2020ā103). As foretold: āIn a letter to the planning department earlier this month, a coalition of seven neighborhood and civic associations representing those areas asked the council to hold off until COVID-19-related meeting restrictions are lifted. The letter says residents feel they have not been able to adequately review the plan and discuss it with city officials.ā Chris Suarez at the Richmond Times-Dispatch has more, but you can probably guess at most of it. I think weāre at the point where folks need to email their Councilmember and tell them to support more space for more people to live next to our best public transit infrastructure. Voting against this rezoning is voting against our Cityās housing, climate, and transit goals. Itās unacceptable. You can find councilmember contact information here, and donāt forget to copy their liaisons.
Sort of related, the Mayor presented part of his plan for increasing affordable housing to Council last night. Roberto Roldan at VPM has some of the details and you can download the full One Richmond: An Equitable Affordable Housing Plan (PDF) for yourself. There is a lot to dig in to here, and I literally just opened the PDF for the first time a minute ago, but, as I scroll through at a rapid pace, I like what I see. Actual policy and program recommendations start on page 38āsome of which arenāt even āask the state to make more things legal for localitiesā! For example, under the second goal, āHousing & Services for Residents with Special Needsā, the plan recommends amending the zoning ordinance to āallow two- and three-family dwelling units in all residential zones.ā Love it! Honestly, a lot of the things I see in this plan match up nicely with the goals and recommendations in the draft Richmond 300 plan, and I appreciate the coming-at-it-from-all-angles approach. Roldan says that Council will need to adopt the plan, so you should look forward to all sorts of public conversations about it.
The Henrico and Richmond City Health Districts will host a free community COVID-19 testing event today at the Broad Rock Community Center (4615 Ferguson Lane) from 4:00ā6:00 PM. If youāve got questions, you can always call the corona-hotline at 804.205.3501. Spread the word, not the virus!
You can watch a presidential debate tonight! Iām not sure you want to, but you totally can! Tune in to your favorite news channel tonight at 9:00 PM for the 90-minute debate that will surely beā¦something.
Iāll be voting yes on Amendment #1 in November. Itās not perfect, but itās our last chance in a good long while to help curtail gerrymandering in Virginia.
But hereās the crucial fact about that substitute legislation: those changes would have reset the clock. That is, it wouldnāt have been the second time that the legislature had voted on this amendment, but the first time they had voted on a new amendment, requiring a pause of two years (so there could be an intervening legislative election) before the legislature could have the second vote. If it passed in 2023, and then voters backed it that November, that amendment would happen years too late for the 2021 redistricting, and have no effect at all until 2031.
If youād like your longread to show up here, go chip in a couple bucks on the olā Patreon.