Good morning, RVA! Itâs 50 °F, and today looks great. Expect highs in the mid 80s and sunshine. Make sure you remember to water your plants, OK?
Â
As of this morning, the Virginia Department of Health reports 378 new positive cases of the coronavirus in the Commonwealth and 13 new deaths as a result of the virus. VDH reports 55 new cases in and around Richmond (Chesterfield: 33, Henrico: 19, and Richmond: 3). Since this pandemic began, 1,309 people have died in the Richmond region. The seven-day average of new reported cases across the state sits at 464. As I mentioned yesterday, you should continue to take these numbers with a grain of salt as things get back on track after a weekend of server maintenance and the ol' Data Reporting Issues. One thing I do wish Iâd started tracking last weekâand will add a column for somewhere in my spreadsheetâis the number of 10â19 year olds with at least one dose (currently 184,778). Thatâs a weird age range to bucket, given the eligibility requirements of the various vaccines, but you take what the dashboard gives, ya know? Anyway, vaccine uptake in children is really fascinating to me, and Iâm interested to see how quickly (or slowly) it grows.
Â
OK, Iâve got some follow up on yesterdayâs Land Use, Housing and Transportation committee meeting which I put on as soothing background music while doing real work. First, the committee voted to recommend for approval RES. 2021-R027, the first step in getting rid of parking minimums. Full City Council should consider this paper at their meeting next week. I think itâs got the votes, but even in this small committee there were a few concerns. For example, via Chris Suarez in the Richmond Times-Dispatch this quote from Councilmember Jordan: âI donât think the city is at a point where we can just eliminate them wholesale right nowâŚKnowing the parking situations that we deal with currently, I donât think this ⌠can be realistic.â Before you nod your head in agreement, remember that getting rid of parking minimums does not remove any parking at all! It just stops forcing businesses to pay for dedicated parking spaces that they may not need or want. Plus, the 2nd District is, by far, the most walkable and bikeable district in the entire City, so maybe ditching parking minimums will have an added benefit of encouraging more active modes of transportation. Anyway, if youâd like to dig in more on what Richmond 300 says about parking, you can check out the 2019 DESMAN parking study.
Â
Second, Maritza Pechin, head of the Cityâs Office of Equitable Development and the person who managed all of the entire Richmond 300 master planning process, gave a presentation on why Councilâs messy, unorganized laundry list of amendments to the master plan is unneeded and bad process. Really what youâre after is slide 16 in that aforelinked presentation: Of Councilâs proposed amendments, 17 are already included in the plan, five just clarify existing parts of the plan, 24 arenât even within the scope of a master plan (which is ultimately about land use), and 21 are fundamental changes that should require a robust community engagement plan like we saw originally with Richmond 300. I only caught parts of the next steps, but the committee did recommend the resolution be continued and I think encouraged councilmembers with proposed amendment to schedule a meeting with Pechin.
Â
GRTC had a board meeting yesterday, which reminded me that itâd been a while since I last checked in on their monthly ridership reports (p. 31). Weâre in a really fascinating moment where we can now compare ridership numbers pre-pandemic, deep-pandemic, and coming-out-of-pandemic. Back in April 2019, GRTC saw 767,179 rides across their entire fixed-route transportation network (local service, express service, and the Pulse). In April 2020, that number plummeted to 522,922. But now, as more and more folks scooch back into the world, ridership in April 2021 topped out at 640,941. Thatâs still a 16% decrease from pre-pandemic times, but itâs a solid 23% jump from last year. While who knows what this all really means, I think you can say that public transit will not bottom out at deep-pandemic levels and stay there forever. Honestly, this was never really going to be the case in Richmond where our bus system serves so many people who donât have a ton of other options to get around.
Â
Ned Oliver at the Virginia Mercury takes a look at new data published by the State this month and reports that âBlack drivers in Virginia are almost two times more likely than white drivers to be pulled over by police and three times more likely to have their vehicles searched.â In fact, Oliver says Black Virginians account for 30% of all traffic stops despite making up only 19% of the stateâs population. A public defender interviewed for this piece suggests that this is less the result of direct racial bias and more an effect of where police are choosing to set up shop, which sounds like a systemic issue. It reminds me of this quote from yesterdayâs longread about housing discrimination: âSystemic is the price comparison modelâŚWhen you only compare homes to like peers in neighborhoods that have been discriminated against, you essentially just recycled discrimination over and over againâŚYou have individual acts of racism and you have more systemic reasons why. Both are robbing people of individual and community wealth.â
Â
While Iâm not fixated on herd immunity, I am fixated on people trying to figure out how to quantify the end of the pandemic.
Â
The appeal of this notion is clear. Achieving herd immunity sounds like a simple goal that spells the end of the coronavirus. It feels concrete â something to grab onto in a time filled with so much uncertainty, a finish line for which to strive. But the problem with framing the goal that way, say the scientists who actually build the models, is that the herd immunity threshold is far harder to calculate reliably than many in the public realize.
Â
If youâd like your longread to show up here, go chip in a couple bucks on the olâ Patreon.
Â