Good morning, RVA! Itâs 76 °F, already! Highs today will climb back up into the mid 90s, and weâll all be real hot. Stay cool, and stay hydrated, yâall.
Justin Mattingly at the Richmond Times-Dispatch has a disappointing but unsurprising article about Richmond Public Schoolsâ proposed redistricting titled âFox Elementary School parents criticize potential âpairingâ with John B. Cary Elementary.â đž Apparently a vocal handful of current and future Fox Elementary parents are pissed about one of the proposed school redistricting options that would âpairâ Fox and Cary Elementaries. Itâs Elementary Option 2 on this map and would send kids living both north and south of the Downtown Expressway to Fox for Kâ2 and then Cary for 3â5. As you can probably guess, this pairing would go a long, long way to racially integrating these two schools. As you can also probably guess, some (and not very many, honestly) parents of Fox Elementaryâa school situated an affluent and mostly White neighborhoodâhad Some Thoughts that you can read for yourself (PDF). The wild thing is that school pairing has been tried before in Richmond. In fact, it was a part of the 1970s attempt to integrate the regionâs schools that ultimately ended up in front of the United States Supreme Court in Bradley v. Richmond School Board. I canât get the Library of Virginiaâs newspaper search to load this morning, but you can bet if we pulled up RTD articles from 1971, weâd read the exact same concerns from (White) parents about consistency in schools, adding stress to the school year, property values and taxes, and threats of moving out of the district. There is nothing new under the sun. As a result of the âgreat deal of feedbackâ from the Fox and Cary communities, RPS will schedule some community meetings toâŠhear even more angry feedback from a vocal minority of parents?
City Councilâs Land Use, Housing and Transportation committee meets today with a bunch of really fascinating things on their agenda (PDF). First the committee will consider a bunch of Standard Project Agreements for cool bike and pedestrian projectsâmeaning theoretically uncontroversial ordinances that authorize the City take money from VDOT to build things. I guess you never know, but should be smooth sailing for: A paved path, bike lane, and an ADA ramp at Dock & 17th to provide better connections between the Capital Trail and the T. Pott Bridge; a shared-use bridge (!) and path over the Canal; a shared-use path out by Williamsburg Avenue and Government Road; a shared-use path paralleling Stony Run Road; and pedestrian safety improvements at Semmes near Patrick Henry School. Whew! Thatâs a lot of good stuff, and hats off to the City staff that absolutely crush getting money out of the State for projects like this. But itâs not all sunshine and bike lanes on the LUHT agenda. The committee will also consider Councilmember Grayâs resolution to prevent certain types of dense residential developmentsâspecifically projects like the conversion of the Lee Medical Building to 60 apartments (RES. 2019-R025). You can read my full thoughts on the resolution here, but, as I said before, reducing residential density is the absolute opposite direction of where our Cityâs housing policy should be headed. Dense conversions are exactly what we need in more and more neighborhoods across Richmond.
Speaking of density! The Cityâs Planning Commission unanimously approved both the rezoning of the area around VUU and the rezoning of Monroe Ward. These changes will head to City Council for their final approval later this month. Planning Commission also did NOT get to see the Richmond 300 Parking presentation and âthe new presentation date has not yet been determined.â Booooo!
Today I found an email from the Gather Coworking folks in my inbox saying that their Broad Street âCity Centerâ location will open on July 24th. This is huge news for me personally, as a grumpy pedestrian, because theyâve had the sidewalk closed at that location, on and off, for a long dang time. Itâll be nice to have all of the construction fencing pulled away and the nice, wide sidewalks retuned to folks trying to get around. I do, however, appreciate that Gather has chosen as amenities to highlight: Proximity to the Pulse, indoor bike racks, and showers. If I wasnât on a personal mission to lower the cultural standard of how sweaty you can be at An Official Business Meeting, those showers would have me real interested.
Everything this shadowy, Rasputin-like Russian guy says is bananas.
Who, then, is a closer peer or antecedent? For an answer, Dugin has to go beyond contemporary politics, beyond Russian history â and into the realm of the fantastic. âI compare myself much more to Merlin.â The great wizard Merlin, the mythical one, the son of an incubus. King Arthurâs advisor. âThe image of the intellectual that is engaged in supra-human contemplation, in the secrets, that tries to clear the way for the secular ruler to create the great empire. âMerlin. The founder of King Arthurâs empire. That is my archetype, I would say.â
If youâd like your longread to show up here, go chip in a couple bucks on the olâ Patreon.