Good morning, RVA! It’s 20 °F, and I continue to be disappointed with our snow situation. What even was that! Bleh. Today, though, you can expect temperatures in the mid 40s, and, later this week, even warmer temperatures through at least Thursday.
Water cooler
Genevieve Siegel-Hawley had a must-read column in the Richmond Times-Dispatch over the weekend: “Lawmakers should hold the line on privatizing public education.” Siegel-Hawley is real smart and this is the column I’ve been looking for on Virginia’s return to segregation academies via Governor Youngkin’s push to expand charter schools. Here’s a quote from the piece: “Effectively recreating dual systems of schooling — a hallmark of the pre-Brown era — by increasing neovouchers and charter schools in Virginia is problematic for all of us. Siphoning substantial funding away from our woefully underresourced, overstretched regular public schools doubles down on separate and unequal schooling for the students left behind. And white, segregated charter and private schools will receive government support to ill-educate future citizens for a multiracial society.”
This is the second, must-read piece in the Richmond Times-Dispatch: Chris Suarez reports on the new attempt to bring a casino to Richmond’s Southside and the extremely stressful plan to pair it with a reduction in the real estate tax rate. Suarez does a great job of laying out how the mayor’s proposed tax reduction would mostly benefit affluent home owners, who mostly voted against the casino. Here it is, plainly put: “Homeowners in precincts that supported the casino on Election Day would save about $40, while those in precincts that opposed it would save about $90.” For context, the tax reduction would cost the city $5.7 million in annual revenue, and, once the rate goes down, it’s nearly impossible to raise again (especially if the Republicans in the General Assembly get their way). That’s a lot of money to hope the casino covers for literally forever. Suarez also talks to local political analyst, Richard Meagher, who points out that throughout his two terms, Mayor Stoney has advocated, multiple times, for tax increases. I can see how the mayor, searching for revenue but stymied by Council, would want to switch his tactics from directly raising it through taxes to enticing huge, taxable developments to the City—see Navy Hill, Casino One, and now Casino Two. I think this is, at least, a consistent and good-faith strategy. It’s not one I agree with, of course, and I’d prefer we replicate what the City’s doing with the Diamond District 100 times, everywhere we can. Where you really lose me, though, is proposing to strip the City from almost $6 million annually—that’s the entire budget of the Richmond Public Library! If folks want to take another swing at a casino, fine, but let’s do that without putting the future work of reinvesting in Richmond at risk. P.S. I think this is one of the best things I’ve read in the paper in a good, long while. Great work (and thank you) to everyone involved!